https://fmhy.net/videopiracyguide

it's a general piracy website with an incredible repository of links and all sorts of stuff to dig into. I just posted that link first cause it's what I'm gonna be looking for, decent illegal streaming websites.

https://fmhy.net

  Zizek, Slavoj - How to Read Lacan.pdf (Size: 4.96 MB / Downloads: 0)
How to Read Lacan


  less_than_nothing.pdf (Size: 11.22 MB / Downloads: 0)
Less Than Nothing: Hegel and the Shadow of Dialectical Materialism
they say Zizek writes the same book over and over but apparently this is the best modern version so ima prolly try this one instead of his OG work "Sublime Object" it's all lacan hegel garbage yk


  zizek-z-violence-2008.pdf (Size: 6.28 MB / Downloads: 0)
Violence: Six Sideways Reflections
"Violence, Zizek states, takes three forms -- subjective (crime, terror), objective (racism, hate-speech, discrimination), and systemic (the catastrophic effects of economic and political systems) -- and often one form of violence blunts our ability to see others, raising complicated questions."

For the best weed mix for smoking yourself, which speeds you up and gives you anti grav so you can fly through town like a madman:
grandaddy purp > redbull > para

For $700/g Miracle Haze meth:
banana > oil > para > gas > cuke > battery > cum > bean

For i think the same price Thick Monkey coke:
oil > cuke > para > gas > cuke > battery > cum > bean

also I JUST FOUND OUT IF YOU HOLD RIGHT CLICK GRABS A BUNCH OF STUFF AT ONCE. I was fucking grabbing leaves for the cauldron or rocks for the tray one at a time over 100 HOURS OF PLAYTIME. 
Idk how I always do this, get super far into a game while missing some basic QOL gameplay aspect.

  Deleuze and Guattari - Difference and repetition (1968).pdf (Size: 3.03 MB / Downloads: 0)
""Difference and Repetition" is a seminal work by philosopher Gilles Deleuze, published in 1968, which articulates his philosophical stance and introduces his exploration of the concept of difference. Deleuze positions his work within the "philosophies of difference" tradition, contrasting it with classical metaphysics that emphasizes identity and stability. He argues for an understanding of difference that exists independently of pre-defined terms, focusing on intrinsic differences that generate meaning rather than simply contrasting identifiable objects.

In this text, Deleuze elaborates on the notions of groundlessness and chaos, suggesting that the chaotic realm is filled with infinite differences that defy simple categorization. He employs concepts from differential calculus to illustrate how these differences can be integrated into coherent structures, using the idea of "abstract machines" to filter chaos into consistent systems. By doing so, he challenges the notion of a pre-existing order and emphasizes the dynamic, ever-evolving nature of reality.

"Difference and Repetition" has had a significant influence on post-structuralist thought and has been pivotal in establishing Deleuze's reputation, paving the way for his later collaborative works with Félix Guattari. The book continues to resonate within contemporary philosophical discussions, providing fresh insights into identity, difference, and the nature of existence."


  Deleuze and Guattari - A Thousand Plateaus (1980).pdf (Size: 3.34 MB / Downloads: 0)
[Libcom Mirror]
(AI) ""A Thousand Plateaus," by Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari, is a complex philosophical work that explores concepts like deterritorialization, territorialization, rhizomes, and schizoanalysis. It argues that traditional hierarchical structures of thought are oppressive and proposes a rhizomatic approach to knowledge, emphasizing fluidity, interconnectedness, and the multiplicity of experience. The book is not structured in a linear fashion, encouraging readers to explore different "plateaus" of thought independently"


  Deleuze and Guattari - Anti Oedipus (1972).pdf (Size: 3.55 MB / Downloads: 0)
[Libcom Mirror]
"Among the most influential, provocative, and controversial philosophical works of the 20th century, Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari’s Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia took up the question first posed by Baruch Spinoza: “Why do men fight for their servitude as stubbornly as though it were their salvation?” For Deleuze and Guattari, finding the answer requires a wholescale reevaluation of psychoanalysis and Marxism. On the one hand, orthodox Marxism offers a brilliant analyses of social relations and processes in the modern world, but lacks a true account of psychology or interiority. On the other hand, psychoanalysis offers insights into interior worlds, but in ways that fall short of both society and history. In part a response to the demonstrations and strikes that took place in France in May of 1968, Anti-Oedipus offers a radical analysis of capitalism that synthesizes political economy and psychology anew. This “schizoanalysis” jettisons a host of prevailing assumptions and crafts in their place new or adapted theoretical concepts now familiar in contemporary social theoretical discourse, like the-body-without-organs, rhizomes and the rhizomatic, desiring-machines, and deterritorialization and reterritorialization, among many others. Anti-Oedipus proposes a politics based on the mobilization of a  “schizoanalytic” unconsciousness: one that is open to everyone, shaped by social and economic forces, and assembled across intersecting flows of desire, “breaks,” and diverse material “fluxes.” In perhaps its ultimate provocation, Anti-Oedipus poses that sexuality is omnipresent, that capitalism has no limits, and that “the revolutionary path” is not to stop either but “to go further, ‘to accelerate the process.’” Why, for Deleuze and Guattari, is desire revolutionary? And how can we understand Anti-Oedipus and its claims today?"

test thread. need to increase file size limit. need to figure out why it wont take epubs


  Blackshirts & Reds -- Rational Fascism and the Overthrow of Communism - Michael Parenti.pdf (Size: 5.09 MB / Downloads: 0)

"This book invites those immersed in the prevailing orthodoxy of "democratic capitalism" to entertain iconoclastic views, to question the shibboleths of free-market mythology and the persistence of both right and left anticommunism, and to consider anew, with a receptive but not uncritical mind, the historic efforts of the much maligned Reds and other revolutionaries.

The political orthodoxy that demonizes communism permeates the entire political perspective. Even people on the Left have internalized the liberal/conservative ideology that equates fascism and communism as equally evil totalitarian twins, two major mass movements of the twentieth century. This book attempts to show the enormous differences between fascism and communism both past and present, both in theory and practice, especially in regard to questions of social equality, private capital accumulation, and class interest.

The orthodox mythology also would have us believe that the Western democracies (with the United States leading the way) have opposed both totalitarian systems with equal vigor. In fact, U.S. leaders have been dedicated above all to making the world safe for global corporate investment and the private profit system. Pursuant of this goal, they have used fascism to protect capitalism, while claiming to be saving democracy from communism."


  Michael Parenti - 2003 - The Assassination of Julius Caesar - A People's History of Ancient Rome (287p).pdf (Size: 822.83 KB / Downloads: 1)

"Most historians, both ancient and modern, have viewed the Late Republic of Rome through the eyes of its rich nobility―the 1 percent of the population who controlled 99 percent of the empire’s wealth. In The Assassination of Julius Caesar, Michael Parenti recounts this period, spanning the years 100 to 33 BC, from the perspective of the Roman people. In doing so, he presents a provocative, trenchantly researched narrative of popular resistance against a powerful elite.

As Parenti carefully weighs the evidence concerning the murder of Caesar, he adds essential context to the crime with fascinating details about Roman society as a whole. In these pages, we find reflections on the democratic struggle waged by Roman commoners, religious augury as an instrument of social control, the patriarchal oppression of women, and the political use of homophobic attacks. The Assassination of Julius Caesar offers a whole new perspective on an era thought to be well-known."

What the hell is this shit hole?

It's a forum, buddy, guy, fwiend, pal.

I know what you're thinking, "what is this, the early 2000s?". YES. That's about the last time I made one, and I'm excited to fiddle around again.
My intention wasn't to create a community. I just wanted a place to sort my thoughts, content, post files, whatever. 
However, anyone is free to join. 

More to come whenever I get to it.